RE:(2) [PATCH v6 5/6] scsi: ufs: wb: Modify messages

From: Jinyoung CHOI
Date: Wed Aug 03 2022 - 00:11:39 EST


Hi, Stanley,

>Hi,
>
>On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:29 PM Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Messages are modified to fit the format of others.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c
>> index 2c0b7f45de4b..117272cf7d61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c
>> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static ssize_t wb_on_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> * If the platform supports UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING, turn WB
>> * on/off will be done while clock scaling up/down.
>> */
>> - dev_warn(dev, "To control WB through wb_on is not allowed!\n");
>> + dev_warn(dev, "It is not allowed to configure WB!\n");
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> index 5099d161f115..dcd7f03db2a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -5737,13 +5737,13 @@ int ufshcd_wb_toggle(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool enable)
>>
>> ret = __ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, enable, QUERY_FLAG_IDN_WB_EN);
>> if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s Write Booster %s failed %d\n",
>> - __func__, enable ? "enable" : "disable", ret);
>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Write Booster %s failed %d\n",
>> + __func__, enable ? "enabling" : "disabling", ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> hba->dev_info.wb_enabled = enable;
>> - dev_info(hba->dev, "%s Write Booster %s\n",
>> + dev_info(hba->dev, "%s: Write Booster %s\n",
>> __func__, enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
>You need to rebase this patch to follow the latest change as
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220709000027.3929970-1-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/

I am currently working on the latest 5.20/scsi-staging.
In this case, can I refer the commit of 5.19/scsi-fixes
and add commit to 5.20/scsi-staging?
Or can I reflect it in my change?
I have no experience, so please guide. :)

Thank you for checking.
Jinyoung.