Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: r8188eu: convert rtw_set_802_11_add_wep error code semantics

From: Phillip Potter
Date: Tue Aug 02 2022 - 19:27:00 EST


On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 10:12:56AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Yes, you've got it right.
>
> I think Dan is suggesting something like the below, but
> not necessarily in a single patch:
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c | 38 ++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c
> index 17f6bcbeebf42..2736bbce83b5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c
> @@ -390,44 +390,38 @@ u8 rtw_set_802_11_authentication_mode(struct adapter *padapter, enum ndis_802_11
> return ret;
> }
>
> -u8 rtw_set_802_11_add_wep(struct adapter *padapter, struct ndis_802_11_wep *wep)
> +int rtw_set_802_11_add_wep(struct adapter *padapter,
> + struct ndis_802_11_wep *wep)
> {
> - int keyid, res;
> - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &padapter->securitypriv;
> - u8 ret = _SUCCESS;
> + int keyid;
> + struct security_priv *secpriv = &padapter->securitypriv;
>
> keyid = wep->KeyIndex & 0x3fffffff;
> -
> - if (keyid >= 4) {
> - ret = false;
> - goto exit;
> - }
> + if (keyid >= 4)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> switch (wep->KeyLength) {
> case 5:
> - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP40_;
> + secpriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP40_;
> break;
> case 13:
> - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP104_;
> + secpriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP104_;
> break;
> default:
> - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _NO_PRIVACY_;
> + secpriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _NO_PRIVACY_;
> break;
> }
>
> - memcpy(&psecuritypriv->dot11DefKey[keyid].skey[0], &wep->KeyMaterial, wep->KeyLength);
> + memcpy(secpriv->dot11DefKey[keyid].skey, &wep->KeyMaterial,
> + wep->KeyLength);
>
> - psecuritypriv->dot11DefKeylen[keyid] = wep->KeyLength;
> + secpriv->dot11DefKeylen[keyid] = wep->KeyLength;
> + secpriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex = keyid;
>
> - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex = keyid;
> + if (rtw_set_key(padapter, secpriv, keyid, 1) == _FAIL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - res = rtw_set_key(padapter, psecuritypriv, keyid, 1);
> -
> - if (res == _FAIL)
> - ret = false;
> -exit:
> -
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
>

Hi Joe,

Thanks for the suggestion, this is pretty much what I'd interpreted from
Dan's advice in the meantime. I will prepare a V2 tomorrow.

Regards,
Phil