Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Rename "cifs" module to "smbfs"

[Enzo Matsumiya]

On 08/02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 04:00:43PM -0300, Enzo Matsumiya wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As part of the ongoing effort to remove the "cifs" nomenclature from the
> > Linux SMB client, I'm proposing the rename of the module to "smbfs".
> >
> > As it's widely known, CIFS is associated to SMB1.0, which, in turn, is
> > associated with the security issues it presented in the past. Using
> > "SMBFS" makes clear what's the protocol in use for outsiders, but also
> > unties it from any particular protocol version. It also fits in the
> > already existing "fs/smbfs_common" and "fs/ksmbd" naming scheme.
> >
> > This short patch series only changes directory names and includes/ifdefs in
> > headers and source code, and updates docs to reflect the rename. Other
> > than that, no source code/functionality is modified (WIP though).
>
> Why did you not reply to Jeff Layton's concern before posting a v2?

Hm, I was pretty sure I did. Sorry about that, I got confused on how my
mail client organized the replies to the initial thread.

Replying to Jeff right now.