Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Tomer Maimon (2022-07-24 02:06:54)
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 06:02, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Furthermore, in DT, reg properties aren't supposed to overlap. When that
> > happens it usually indicates the DT is being written to describe driver
> > structure instead of the IP blocks that are delivered by the hardware
> > engineer. In this case it sounds like a combined clk and reset IP block
> > because they piled all the SoC glue stuff into a register range. Are
> > there more features in this IO range?
> 
> No, this range only combined the reset and clock together, but it
> combined in a way that we cannot split it to two or even three
> different registers...

Because it is jumbled in some range?

> 
> I do see a way to combine the clock and the reset driver, the NPCM
> reset driver is serving other NPCM BMC's.
> Should we use regmap to handle the clock registers instead of ioremap?

Sure? Using regmap or not looks like a parallel discussion. How does it
help use platform APIs?