Re: [PATCH v11 2/8] hwtracing: hisi_ptt: Add trace function support for HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace device

From: Yicong Yang
Date: Fri Jul 29 2022 - 05:58:22 EST


[ reply again in plain text, sorry for the wrong format ]

On 2022/7/29 17:05, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:29:14PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Handle the interrupt on the same cpu which starts the trace to avoid
>>>> + * context mismatch. Otherwise we'll trigger the WARN from the perf
>>>> + * core in event_function_local().
>>>> + */
>>>> + WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(pci_irq_vector(hisi_ptt->pdev, HISI_PTT_TRACE_DMA_IRQ),
>>>> + cpumask_of(cpu)));
>>>
>>> If this hits, you just crashed the machine :(
>>>
>>
>> We'll likely to have a calltrace here without crash the machine and reboot in
>> most time, unless user has set panic_on_warn.
>
> Again, please do not use WARN_ON for this, please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc8/source/include/asm-generic/bug.h#L74
>
> If you want a traceback (what would you do with that?), then call the
> function to give you that. Don't crash people's boxes.
>

ok, will change to a dev_warn/err() per documented.

>>> Please properly recover from errors if you hit them, like this. Don't
>>> just give up and throw a message to userspace and watch the machine
>>> reboot with all data lost.
>>>
>>> Same for the other WARN_ON() instances here. Handle the error and
>>> report it properly up the call chain.
>>>
>>
>> The driver use WARN_ON() in two places, once in pmu::start() and another in cpu teardown's
>> callback, both when the irq_set_affinity() failed. This is common to behave so when driver
>> fails to set irq affinity in pmu::start() and cpu_teardown():
>
> Don't repeat broken patterns please.
>
>> yangyicong@ubuntu:~/mainline_linux/linux/drivers$ grep -rn WARN_ON ./ | grep irq_set_affinity
>> ./perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:649: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(smmu_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(target)));
>> ./perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:895: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(smmu_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(smmu_pmu->on_cpu)));
>> ./perf/arm-ccn.c:1214: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(ccn->irq, cpumask_of(dt->cpu)));
>> ./perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c:796: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(cluster->irq, cpumask_of(cpu)));
>> ./perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c:834: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(cluster->irq, cpumask_of(target)));
>> ./perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c:624: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(irq->irq_num, cpumask_of(target)));
>> ./perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c:674: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(pmu->irq, cpumask_of(pmu->cpu)));
>> ./perf/xgene_pmu.c:1793: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(xgene_pmu->irq, &xgene_pmu->cpu));
>> ./perf/xgene_pmu.c:1826: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(xgene_pmu->irq, &xgene_pmu->cpu));
>> ./perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c:658: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(pcie_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(cpu)));
>> ./perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c:684: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(pcie_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(target)));
>> ./perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c:495: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(hisi_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(cpu)));
>> ./perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c:528: WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(hisi_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(target)));
>
> Great, you can fix all of these up as well any time :)
>

will have a look on this.

Thanks.