Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] thermal/core: Build ascending ordered indexes for the trip points

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 25/07/2022 18:29, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 22/07/2022 19:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > They can be made in the opposite direction, starting at the core
> > level.  Then, it would be clear where you were going.
> >
> > > I would like to
> > > keep the indexes trip array approach to fix the trip cross events which
> > > is broken right now and then go forward with the struct thermal_trip
> > > changes and the thermal-of cleanups I've sent last week.
> > >
> > > Does it sound reasonable ?
> >
> > I'm not convinced about the need to make the code more complicated if
> > the overall direction is to simplify it.
> >
> > I understand that you want to avoid regressing things, but you want to
> > make these changes eventually anyway, so why to you think that the
> > risk of regressing things would be smaller in the future, after making
> > the code more complicated than it is now?  Sounds counter-intuitive to
> > me.
>
> Ok, I'll rework the core code for that.
>
> Having the series [1] and the new version of [2] will have the trip 
> point partly reworked.
>
> Thanks
>    -- Daniel

Adding missing pointers:

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220722200007.1839356-7-daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx/T/

[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220710212423.681301-1-daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx/



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog