Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] devlink: introduce framework for selftests

From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Mon Jul 25 2022 - 07:07:14 EST


Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:48:39AM CEST, vikas.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi Jiri,
>
>On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 1:23 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 06:16:00PM CEST, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:52:05 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
>> >> +enum devlink_attr_selftest_test_id {
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_UNSPEC,
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_FLASH, /* flag */
>> >> +
>> >> + __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX,
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX = __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_TEST_ID_MAX - 1
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +enum devlink_selftest_test_status {
>> >> + DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_SKIP,
>> >> + DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_PASS,
>> >> + DEVLINK_SELFTEST_TEST_STATUS_FAIL
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +enum devlink_attr_selftest_result {
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_UNSPEC,
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT, /* nested */
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_ID, /* u32,
>> >> + * enum devlink_attr_selftest_test_id
>> >> + */
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_STATUS, /* u8,
>> >> + * enum devlink_selftest_test_status
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> + __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX,
>> >> + DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX = __DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_MAX - 1
>> >
>> >Any thoughts on running:
>> >
>> > sed -i '/_SELFTEST/ {s/_TEST_/_/g}' $patch
>>
>> Sure, why not. But please make sure you keep all other related things
>> (variables, cmdline opts) consistent.
>>
>> Thanks!
>Does the 'test_id' in command line
> 'devlink dev selftests run DEV test_id flash'
>will still hold good if DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_ID changes
>to DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_ID ?
>or it should be
>'devlink dev selftests run DEV selftest_id flash' ?

Just "id". Thanks!


>
>Thanks,
>Vikas
>
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >on this patch? For example DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_RESULT_TEST_STATUS
>> >is 40 characters long, ain't nobody typing that, and _TEST is repeated..
>> >
>> >Otherwise LGTM!