Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] irqchip: Add RZ/G2L IA55 Interrupt Controller driver

From: Lad, Prabhakar
Date: Thu Jun 30 2022 - 01:40:56 EST


Hi Philipp,

Thank you for the review.

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:29 PM Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sa, 2022-06-25 at 21:05 +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > Add a driver for the Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller.
> >
> > This supports external pins being used as interrupts. It supports
> > one line for NMI, 8 external pins and 32 GPIO pins (out of 123)
> > to be used as IRQ lines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 402 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> >
> [...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..cc16fcf2bbc6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
> [...]
> > +static int rzg2l_irqc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> > +{
> > + struct irq_domain *irq_domain, *parent_domain;
> > + struct platform_device *pdev;
> > + struct reset_control *resetn;
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> > + if (!pdev)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + parent_domain = irq_find_host(parent);
> > + if (!parent_domain) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot find parent domain\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!priv)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + priv->base = devm_of_iomap(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.of_node, 0, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> > +
> > + ret = rzg2l_irqc_parse_interrupts(priv, node);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot parse interrupts: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + resetn = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_by_index(&pdev->dev, 0);
>
> Why is this by index? I'd expect
>
> resetn = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>
> should work just as well?
>
Agreed will replace it to devm_reset_control_get_exclusive().

Cheers,
Prabhakar