Re: [PATCH] perf data: Prefer sampled CPU when exporting JSON

From: Shawn M. Chapla
Date: Wed Jun 22 2022 - 12:39:24 EST


On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 01:30:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:42:43AM -0400, Shawn M. Chapla escreveu:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:14:47PM -0400, Shawn M. Chapla wrote:
> > > When CPU has been explicitly sampled (via --sample-cpu), prefer this
> > > sampled value over the thread CPU value when exporting to JSON.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn M. Chapla <schapla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c | 5 ++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c b/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c
> > > index f1ab6edba446..613d6ae82663 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c
> > > @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > > struct convert_json *c = container_of(tool, struct convert_json, tool);
> > > FILE *out = c->out;
> > > struct addr_location al, tal;
> > > + u64 sample_type = __evlist__combined_sample_type(evsel->evlist);
> > > u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> > >
> > > if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
> > > @@ -168,7 +169,9 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > > output_json_key_format(out, true, 3, "pid", "%i", al.thread->pid_);
> > > output_json_key_format(out, true, 3, "tid", "%i", al.thread->tid);
> > >
> > > - if (al.thread->cpu >= 0)
> > > + if ((sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CPU))
> > > + output_json_key_format(out, true, 3, "cpu", "%i", sample->cpu);
> > > + else if (al.thread->cpu >= 0)
> > > output_json_key_format(out, true, 3, "cpu", "%i", al.thread->cpu);
> > >
> > > output_json_key_string(out, true, 3, "comm", thread__comm_str(al.thread));
> > > --
> > > 2.36.1
> > >
> >
> > Just checking in to see if anyone has had a chance to take a look at
> > this yet.
>
> Seems sensible, applying to perf/core for 5.20.
>
> - Arnaldo

Thank you! I appreciate it.

Cheers,
Shawn