Re: [PATCH 1/1] Bluetooth: Use chan_list_lock to protect the whole put/destroy invokation

[Luiz Augusto von Dentz]

Hi Lee,

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:21 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:38 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 07 Jun 2022, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > This change prevents a use-after-free caused by one of the worker
> > > > threads starting up (see below) *after* the final channel reference
> > > > has been put() during sock_close() but *before* the references to the
> > > > channel have been destroyed.
> > > >
> > > >   refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.
> > > >   BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in refcount_dec_and_test+0x20/0xd0
> > > >   Read of size 4 at addr ffffffc114f5bf18 by task kworker/u17:14/705
> > > >
> > > >   CPU: 4 PID: 705 Comm: kworker/u17:14 Tainted: G S      W       4.14.234-00003-g1fb6d0bd49a4-dirty #28
> > > >   Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM8150 V2 PM8150 Google Inc. MSM sm8150 Flame DVT (DT)
> > > >   Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
> > > >   Call trace:
> > > >    dump_backtrace+0x0/0x378
> > > >    show_stack+0x20/0x2c
> > > >    dump_stack+0x124/0x148
> > > >    print_address_description+0x80/0x2e8
> > > >    __kasan_report+0x168/0x188
> > > >    kasan_report+0x10/0x18
> > > >    __asan_load4+0x84/0x8c
> > > >    refcount_dec_and_test+0x20/0xd0
> > > >    l2cap_chan_put+0x48/0x12c
> > > >    l2cap_recv_frame+0x4770/0x6550
> > > >    l2cap_recv_acldata+0x44c/0x7a4
> > > >    hci_acldata_packet+0x100/0x188
> > > >    hci_rx_work+0x178/0x23c
> > > >    process_one_work+0x35c/0x95c
> > > >    worker_thread+0x4cc/0x960
> > > >    kthread+0x1a8/0x1c4
> > > >    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > No reply for 2 weeks.
> > >
> > > Is this patch being considered at all?
> > >
> > > Can I help in any way?
> >
> > Could you please resend to trigger CI, looks like CI missed this one
> > for some reason.
>
> Should I submit it as I did before?  Or did I miss a mailing address?

Just resend, you can tag with RESEND, looks like the original one got
stuck in CI since only 1 test was run:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/patch/20220607134709.373344-1-lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx/

> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog



-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz