Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: qcom: msm8996-cpu: Statically define PLL dividers

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 19:07, Yassine Oudjana <yassine.oudjana@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This will allow for adding them to clk_parent_data arrays
> in an upcoming patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> index 5dc68dc3621f..217f9392c23d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cpu-8996.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,34 @@ static struct clk_alpha_pll pwrcl_pll = {
>         },
>  };
>
> +static struct clk_fixed_factor pwrcl_pll_postdiv = {
> +       .mult = 1,
> +       .div = 2,
> +       .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> +               .name = "pwrcl_pll_postdiv",
> +               .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> +                       .hw = &pwrcl_pll.clkr.hw
> +               },
> +               .num_parents = 1,
> +               .ops = &clk_fixed_factor_ops,
> +               .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> +       },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_fixed_factor perfcl_pll_postdiv = {
> +       .mult = 1,
> +       .div = 2,
> +       .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> +               .name = "perfcl_pll_postdiv",
> +               .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> +                       .hw = &perfcl_pll.clkr.hw
> +               },
> +               .num_parents = 1,
> +               .ops = &clk_fixed_factor_ops,
> +               .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> +       },
> +};
> +
>  static const struct pll_vco alt_pll_vco_modes[] = {
>         VCO(3,  250000000,  500000000),
>         VCO(2,  500000000,  750000000),
> @@ -261,7 +289,7 @@ static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux pwrcl_smux = {
>                 .name = "pwrcl_smux",
>                 .parent_names = (const char *[]){
>                         "xo",
> -                       "pwrcl_pll_main",
> +                       "pwrcl_pll_postdiv",
>                 },
>                 .num_parents = 2,
>                 .ops = &clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops,
> @@ -277,7 +305,7 @@ static struct clk_cpu_8996_mux perfcl_smux = {
>                 .name = "perfcl_smux",
>                 .parent_names = (const char *[]){
>                         "xo",
> -                       "perfcl_pll_main",
> +                       "perfcl_pll_postdiv",
>                 },
>                 .num_parents = 2,
>                 .ops = &clk_cpu_8996_mux_ops,
> @@ -354,32 +382,25 @@ static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_register_clks(struct device *dev,
>  {
>         int i, ret;
>
> -       perfcl_smux.pll = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "perfcl_pll_main",
> -                                                      "perfcl_pll",
> -                                                      CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> -                                                      1, 2);
> -       if (IS_ERR(perfcl_smux.pll)) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize perfcl_pll_main\n");
> -               return PTR_ERR(perfcl_smux.pll);
> +       ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &pwrcl_pll_postdiv.hw);

No need to. I'd suggest picking up the
devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor patch from my patchset and using
this API.

> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to register pwrcl_pll_postdiv: %d", ret);
> +               return ret;
>         }
>
> -       pwrcl_smux.pll = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "pwrcl_pll_main",
> -                                                     "pwrcl_pll",
> -                                                     CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> -                                                     1, 2);
> -       if (IS_ERR(pwrcl_smux.pll)) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize pwrcl_pll_main\n");
> -               clk_hw_unregister(perfcl_smux.pll);
> -               return PTR_ERR(pwrcl_smux.pll);
> +       ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &perfcl_pll_postdiv.hw);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to register perfcl_pll_postdiv: %d", ret);
> +               return ret;
>         }
>
> +       pwrcl_smux.pll = &pwrcl_pll_postdiv.hw;
> +       perfcl_smux.pll = &perfcl_pll_postdiv.hw;
> +
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_msm8996_clks); i++) {
>                 ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, cpu_msm8996_clks[i]);
> -               if (ret) {
> -                       clk_hw_unregister(perfcl_smux.pll);
> -                       clk_hw_unregister(pwrcl_smux.pll);
> +               if (ret)
>                         return ret;
> -               }
>         }
>
>         clk_alpha_pll_configure(&perfcl_pll, regmap, &hfpll_config);
> @@ -409,9 +430,6 @@ static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_unregister_clks(void)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       clk_hw_unregister(perfcl_smux.pll);
> -       clk_hw_unregister(pwrcl_smux.pll);
> -
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry