Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' member of busy_tag_iter_fn

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jun 20 2022 - 02:00:43 EST

Next message: Hannes Reinecke: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: pm8001: Use non-atomic bitmap ops for tag alloc + free"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: fnic: Drop reserved request handling"
In reply to: John Garry: "Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' member of busy_tag_iter_fn"
Next in thread: Hannes Reinecke: "Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' member of busy_tag_iter_fn"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Next message: Hannes Reinecke: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: pm8001: Use non-atomic bitmap ops for tag alloc + free"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi: fnic: Drop reserved request handling"
In reply to: John Garry: "Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' member of busy_tag_iter_fn"
Next in thread: Hannes Reinecke: "Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' member of busy_tag_iter_fn"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]