Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Jun 17 2022 - 15:04:37 EST

Next message: Robert Beckett: "[PATCH v6 02/10] drm/i915: limit ttm to dma32 for i965G[M]"
Previous message: Dan Williams: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] cxl/mbox: Add GET_POISON_LIST mailbox command support"
In reply to: Waiman Long: "Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers"
Next in thread: Eric Dumazet: "Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 07:45:14PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Were rwlocks always unfair, and we have been lucky ?

Yes.

Next message: Robert Beckett: "[PATCH v6 02/10] drm/i915: limit ttm to dma32 for i965G[M]"
Previous message: Dan Williams: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] cxl/mbox: Add GET_POISON_LIST mailbox command support"
In reply to: Waiman Long: "Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers"
Next in thread: Eric Dumazet: "Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]