Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] drm/msm/dp: clean up pixel_rate from dp_ctrl.c

From: Kuogee Hsieh
Date: Thu Jun 16 2022 - 16:29:08 EST



On 6/16/2022 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-06-16 10:09:21)
dp_ctrl keep an local cache of pixel_rate which increase confusing
in regrading how pixel_rate being used. This patch refer pixel_rate
directly from dp_panel to eliminate unnecessary pixel_rate variable
from struct dp_ctrl.

Changes in v8:
-- add this patch to remove pixel_rate from dp_ctrl

Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I can send a proper patch for this myself later.
ok, then I will drop this patch

---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h | 2 -
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
index 01028b5..6fddddd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
@@ -1528,36 +1526,6 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_maintenance(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
return ret;
}

-static int dp_ctrl_process_phy_test_request(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
-{
- int ret = 0;
-
- if (!ctrl->link->phy_params.phy_test_pattern_sel) {
- drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev,
- "no test pattern selected by sink\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
- /*
- * The global reset will need DP link related clocks to be
- * running. Add the global reset just before disabling the
- * link clocks and core clocks.
- */
- ret = dp_ctrl_off(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
- if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("failed to disable DP controller\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
- ret = dp_ctrl_on_link(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
- if (!ret)
- ret = dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
- else
- DRM_ERROR("failed to enable DP link controller\n");
-
- return ret;
-}
-
static bool dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
{
bool success = false;
@@ -1610,6 +1578,56 @@ static bool dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
return success;
}

+int dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
+ unsigned long pixel_rate;
+
+ ctrl = container_of(dp_ctrl, struct dp_ctrl_private, dp_ctrl);
+
+ pixel_rate = ctrl->panel->dp_mode.drm_mode.clock;
+ ret = dp_ctrl_enable_stream_clocks(ctrl, pixel_rate);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Failed to start pixel clocks. ret=%d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(ctrl);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dp_ctrl_process_phy_test_request(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (!ctrl->link->phy_params.phy_test_pattern_sel) {
+ drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev,
+ "no test pattern selected by sink\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The global reset will need DP link related clocks to be
+ * running. Add the global reset just before disabling the
+ * link clocks and core clocks.
+ */
+ ret = dp_ctrl_off(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("failed to disable DP controller\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = dp_ctrl_on_link(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
+ else
+ DRM_ERROR("failed to enable DP link controller\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
void dp_ctrl_handle_sink_request(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
{
struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
I'd prefer these hunks to be part of a different patch. Either squashed
into the previous patch, or after the previous patch to show that a
forward declaration isn't necessary, but helped minimize the diff of
that patch.

@@ -1685,6 +1703,7 @@ int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
u32 const phy_cts_pixel_clk_khz = 148500;
u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
unsigned int training_step;
+ unsigned long pixel_rate;

if (!dp_ctrl)
return -EINVAL;