Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] tmp, tmp_tis: Implement usage counter for locality

[Lino Sanfilippo]

On 15.06.22 at 20:23, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:08:43PM +0200, LinoSanfilippo@xxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Implement a usage counter for the (default) locality used by the TPM TIS
>> driver:
>> Request the locality from the TPM if it has not been claimed yet, otherwise
>> only increment the counter. Also release the locality if the counter is 0
>> otherwise only decrement the counter. Ensure thread-safety by protecting
>> the counter with a mutex.
>>
>> This allows to request and release the locality from a thread and the
>> interrupt handler at the same time without the danger to interfere with
>> each other.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h |  2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> index 028bec44362d..0ef74979bc2c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> @@ -158,16 +158,26 @@ static bool check_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
>>  	return false;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int release_locality_locked(struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int l)
>> +{
>> +	tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_ACCESS(l), TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY);
>
> nit: empty line here
>
> Also it would not hurt to prefix it with tpm_tis.
>
> This is for simple and practical reasons, like grepping. I don't
> mind if you do that also for other functions (if you want to).
>

Ok, will do so.

Regards,
Lino