Re: [PATCH 23/36] arm64,smp: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle() usage

[Marc Zyngier]

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:24:48 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Ever since commit d3afc7f12987 ("arm64: Allow IPIs to be handled as
> > normal interrupts") this function is called in regular IRQ context.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [adding Marc since he authored that commit]
> 
> Makes sense to me:
> 
>   Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Mark.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
> >  	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >  
> >  	if ((unsigned)ipinr < NR_IPI)
> > -		trace_ipi_entry_rcuidle(ipi_types[ipinr]);
> > +		trace_ipi_entry(ipi_types[ipinr]);
> >  
> >  	switch (ipinr) {
> >  	case IPI_RESCHEDULE:
> > @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if ((unsigned)ipinr < NR_IPI)
> > -		trace_ipi_exit_rcuidle(ipi_types[ipinr]);
> > +		trace_ipi_exit(ipi_types[ipinr]);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static irqreturn_t ipi_handler(int irq, void *data)

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.