Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite driver binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/06/2022 14:09, Pandey, Radhey Shyam wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 2:40 PM
>> To: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxx>;
>> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; Katakam, Harini
>> <harini.katakam@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx
>> emaclite driver binding
>>
>> On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 22:23 +0530, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>>> Add basic description for the xilinx emaclite driver DT bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Even if marked for 'net-next', my understanding is that should go via the
>> device tree repo. I'm dropping from the netdev patchwork, please correct me if
>> I'm wrong, thanks!
> 
> I have seen a mixed set of the convention for dts patches. They are following
> both routes i.e device tree or subsystem repos provided acked from device
> tree maintainer.  If there is preference for device tree repo then I can drop
> net-next from subject prefix and resend it for the dt repo.

If you got Ack from Devicetree bindings maintainer (Rob Herring or me),
then feel free to take it via net-next. I think, it is actually
preferred, unless this is some fix which needs to go via DT (Rob's) tree.

If you don't have these acks, then better don't take it :) unless it's
really waiting too long on the lists. I hope it's not that case.


Best regards,
Krzysztof