Re: [PATCH 5.17 000/772] 5.17.14-rc1 review
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Thu Jun 09 2022 - 09:38:15 EST
On 6/9/22 05:51, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 19:24, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.14 release.
There are 772 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:48:02 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.14-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions found on qemu_x86_64:
- kunit/kasan [1]
Regressions found on qemu_i386:
- kunit/kfence [2]
- kunit/test_out_of_bounds_read
We will bisect and let you know more details about this reported problem.
The bisect script pointed me to this commit and reverted and tested and
confirmed.
I see the same error messages after enabling CONFIG_KFENCE_KUNIT_TEST, but
it doesn't go away after removing the patch below. That patch also seems
to be completely unrelated to the error.
I also see the same problem in the mainline kernel. I suspect that something
is wrong with CONFIG_KFENCE_KUNIT_TEST.
Guenter
commit 1883088ed4a0d5cc9cea500ca4e89a354ab32c11
Author: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri May 27 23:28:18 2022 +0800
md: bcache: check the return value of kzalloc() in detached_dev_do_request()
commit 40f567bbb3b0639d2ec7d1c6ad4b1b018f80cf19 upstream.
The function kzalloc() in detached_dev_do_request() can fail, so its
return value should be checked.
Fixes: bc082a55d25c ("bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached
bcache devices")
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527152818.27545-4-colyli@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index d15aae6c51c1..673a680240a9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -1107,6 +1107,12 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct
bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
* which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
*/
ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
+ if (!ddip) {
+ bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+ bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+ return;
+ }
+
ddip->d = d;
/* Count on the bcache device */
ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
[1] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e/testrun/10038101/suite/kunit/test/kasan/details/
[2] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e/testrun/10038215/suite/kunit/test/kfence/details/
## Build
* kernel: 5.17.14-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.17.y
* git commit: d0f9b2818e1e4d43847e10d6e5310a0c653cb18f
* git describe: v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
Regressions found on qemu_x86_64:
- kunit/kasan [1]
Regressions found on qemu_i386:
- kunit/kfence [2]
- kunit/test_out_of_bounds_read
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 134591, pass: 121555, fail: 447, skip: 11730, xfail: 859
## Build Summary
* arm: 17 total, 14 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 17 total, 12 passed, 5 failed
* mips: 4 total, 1 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 2 total, 0 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org