Re: [PATCH] virtio: Directly use ida_alloc_range()/ida_free()

[tomorrow Wang (王德明)]

Hi,
> Hi,
> 
> Le 08/06/2022 à 08:08, Deming Wang a écrit :
> > Use ida_alloc_range()/ida_free() instead of deprecated
> > ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove() .
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 5 ++---
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c index
> > 935a1d0ddb97..384049cfca8d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > @@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_release_dev(struct device
> *device)
> >   	struct vhost_vdpa *v =
> >   	       container_of(device, struct vhost_vdpa, dev);
> >
> > -	ida_simple_remove(&vhost_vdpa_ida, v->minor);
> > +	ida_free(&vhost_vdpa_ida, v->minor);
> >   	kfree(v->vqs);
> >   	kfree(v);
> >   }
> > @@ -1316,8 +1316,7 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_probe(struct vdpa_device
> *vdpa)
> >   	if (!v)
> >   		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -	minor = ida_simple_get(&vhost_vdpa_ida, 0,
> > -			       VHOST_VDPA_DEV_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	minor = ida_alloc_range(&vhost_vdpa_ida, 0, VHOST_VDPA_DEV_MAX -
> 1,
> > +GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> ida_alloc_max() would be better here. It is less verbose.
> 
> An explanation in the commit log of why the -1 is needed would also help
> reviewer/maintainer, IMHO.
> 
> It IS correct, but it is not that obvious without looking at
> ida_simple_get() and ida_alloc_range().
> 
> CJ
> 
> 
> >   	if (minor < 0) {
> >   		kfree(v);
> >   		return minor;


can I mention one patch about repair ida_free  for this.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature