Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] spi: Use device_find_first_child() instead of custom approach

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 02:49:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> Why not exactly?  match_true() above and device_match_any() have the
> same signature from what I can tell:
> 	static int match_true(struct device *dev, void *data)
> 	int device_match_any(struct device *dev, const void *unused)
> 
> What am I missing, the const?

Yep! Compiler is very unhappy about it.

> > I agree that all thing should be using _any instead of _first.
> 
> Yes, so let's fix it please, don't propagate bad patterns.

Will do, thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko