Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers

[Ying Huang]

On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 13:54 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
> On 6/8/22 12:46 PM, Ying Huang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 17:55 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > > 
> > > +static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = subsys_system_register(&memory_tier_subsys, memory_tier_attr_groups);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		panic("%s() failed to register subsystem: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > 
> > I don't think we should go panic for failing to register subsys and
> > device for memory tiers.  Just pr_err() should be enough.
> > 
> 
> So you are suggesting we continue to work with memory tiers with no 
> userspace interface?

Yes.  We don't need to panic system for this.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Register only default memory tier to hide all empty
> > > +	 * memory tier from sysfs.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	ret = register_memory_tier(DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		panic("%s() failed to register memory tier: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * CPU only nodes are not part of memoty tiers.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	memory_tiers[DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER]->nodelist = node_states[N_MEMORY];
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +subsys_initcall(memory_tier_init);
> > > +
> > > +#endif	/* CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY */
> > 
> > 
>