Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: LPSS: make the Kconfig dependency on PMC_ATOM explicit

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:24:28AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The code in acpi_lpss.c has been unconditionally using pmc_atom_read()
> for about the past six years.  This hasn't been a problem since you
> currently can't disable PMC_ATOM short of disabling PCI entirely.
> 
> But it doesn't need to be that way, and so that we can change Kconfigs
> in a subsequent commit, we make sure LPSS selects PMC_ATOM in advance,
> so that existing .config files can live on with "make oldconfig".
> 
> In theory, one could make LPSS build w/o PMC_ATOM, similar to what it
> did six years ago, but I doubt there is any demand for that now.

I'm wondering if without LPSS we may use those devices to some extend.
If it's the case, this patch is half-baked since it's missed the network
and audio drivers to also enable it (see PMC clock driver registration
and usage).

That said, I'm not sure it's beneficial to spread this selection over
the drivers that may be used widely on non-Intel-Atom platforms.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko