Re: [PATCH v2] irq_work: Make irq_work_queue_on() NMI-safe again

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Apr 28 2022 - 05:44:50 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[ammarfaizi2-block:dhowells/linux-fs/netfs-linked-list 39/45] fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:669:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)"
Previous message: Herve Codina: "Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] soc: renesas: rzn1: Select PM and PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS configs"
In reply to: Jun Miao: "[PATCH v2] irq_work: Make irq_work_queue_on() NMI-safe again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:55:49PM +0800, Jun Miao wrote:
> We should not put NMI unsafe code in irq_work_queue_on().

Why not, irq_work_queue_on() is not NMI safe. Only irq_work_queue() is.

Next message: kernel test robot: "[ammarfaizi2-block:dhowells/linux-fs/netfs-linked-list 39/45] fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:669:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)"
Previous message: Herve Codina: "Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] soc: renesas: rzn1: Select PM and PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS configs"
In reply to: Jun Miao: "[PATCH v2] irq_work: Make irq_work_queue_on() NMI-safe again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]