[for-next][PATCH 19/21] ring-buffer: Simplify if-if to if-else

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@xxxxxxxx>

Use if and else instead of if(A) and if (!A).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220426070628.167565-1-wanjiabing@xxxxxxxx

Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 05dfc7a12d3d..655d6db3e3c3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -6011,10 +6011,10 @@ static __init int test_ringbuffer(void)
 		pr_info("        total events:   %ld\n", total_lost + total_read);
 		pr_info("  recorded len bytes:   %ld\n", total_len);
 		pr_info(" recorded size bytes:   %ld\n", total_size);
-		if (total_lost)
+		if (total_lost) {
 			pr_info(" With dropped events, record len and size may not match\n"
 				" alloced and written from above\n");
-		if (!total_lost) {
+		} else {
 			if (RB_WARN_ON(buffer, total_len != total_alloc ||
 				       total_size != total_written))
 				break;
-- 
2.35.1