Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: core: constify pointer to scsi_host_template

[Bart Van Assche]

On 4/25/22 06:04, John Garry wrote:
> On 25/04/2022 10:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > For example scsi_proc_hostdir_rm(): 'present' and 'proc_dir' members.
> > Where should they be stored? Should they be moved to the Scsi_Host?
>
> I don't think scsi_Host is appropriate as this is per-scsi host 
> template, unless you see a way to do it that way. Alternatively we could 
> keep a separate list of registered sht, like this:
>
> struct sht_proc_dir {
>      int cnt;
>      struct list_head list;
>      struct proc_dir_entry *proc_dir;
>      struct scsi_host_template *sht;
> };
> static LIST_HEAD(sht_proc_dir_list);
>
> void scsi_proc_hostdir_add(struct scsi_host_template *sht)
> {
>      struct sht_proc_dir *dir;
>
>      if (!sht->show_info)
>          return;
>
>      mutex_lock(&global_host_template_mutex);
>      list_for_each_entry(dir, &sht_proc_dir_list, list) {
>          if (dir->sht == sht) {
>              dir->cnt++;
>              goto out;
>          }
>      }
>      dir = kzalloc(sizeof(*dir), GFP_KERNEL);
>      if (!dir)
>          goto out;
>
>      dir->proc_dir = proc_mkdir(sht->proc_name, proc_scsi);
>      if (!dir->proc_dir) {
>          printk(KERN_ERR "%s: proc_mkdir failed for %s\n",
>                     __func__, sht->proc_name);
>          kfree(dir);
>          goto out;
>      }
>
>      dir->cnt++;
>      list_add_tail(&dir->list, &sht_proc_dir_list);
> out:
>      mutex_unlock(&global_host_template_mutex);
> }

How about removing scsi_proc_hostdir_add(), scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() and 
all other code that creates files or directories under /proc/scsi? There 
should be corresponding entries in sysfs for all /proc/scsi entries. 
Some tools in sg3_utils use that directory so sg3_utils will have to be 
updated.

Thanks,

Bart.