Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: lan966x: Add support for PTP_PF_EXTTS

[Richard Cochran]

On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 04:58:24PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:

> @@ -321,6 +321,63 @@ irqreturn_t lan966x_ptp_irq_handler(int irq, void *args)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +irqreturn_t lan966x_ptp_ext_irq_handler(int irq, void *args)
> +{
> +	struct lan966x *lan966x = args;
> +	struct lan966x_phc *phc;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u64 time = 0;
> +	time64_t s;
> +	int pin, i;
> +	s64 ns;
> +
> +	if (!(lan_rd(lan966x, PTP_PIN_INTR)))
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> +	/* Go through all domains and see which pin generated the interrupt */
> +	for (i = 0; i < LAN966X_PHC_COUNT; ++i) {
> +		struct ptp_clock_event ptp_event = {0};
> +
> +		phc = &lan966x->phc[i];
> +		pin = ptp_find_pin(phc->clock, PTP_PF_EXTTS, 0);

Not safe to call ptp_find_pin() from ISR.  See comment in include/linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h

Thanks,
Richard