Re: [PATCH 15/15] seqlock: drop seqcount_ww_mutex_t

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Thu Apr 07 2022 - 05:19:43 EST


On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Daniel pointed out that this series removes the last user of
> seqcount_ww_mutex_t, so let's drop this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yeah I don't think we'll ever need this again, ww_mutex aren't common and
the ww_mutex+seqlock thing wasn't the brighest idea.

Peter/Ingo, assuming you agree, can you ack this for merging through
drm-misc, or want to pick this up later on when the last user disappeared
in Linus' tree?

Cheers, Daniel

> ---
> include/linux/seqlock.h | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> index 37ded6b8fee6..3926e9027947 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
> #include <linux/kcsan-checks.h>
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> @@ -164,7 +163,7 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s)
> * static initializer or init function. This enables lockdep to validate
> * that the write side critical section is properly serialized.
> *
> - * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock, mutex, or ww_mutex.
> + * LOCKNAME: raw_spinlock, spinlock, rwlock or mutex
> */
>
> /*
> @@ -184,7 +183,6 @@ static inline void seqcount_lockdep_reader_access(const seqcount_t *s)
> #define seqcount_spinlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, spinlock)
> #define seqcount_rwlock_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, rwlock)
> #define seqcount_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, mutex)
> -#define seqcount_ww_mutex_init(s, lock) seqcount_LOCKNAME_init(s, lock, ww_mutex)
>
> /*
> * SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME() - Instantiate seqcount_LOCKNAME_t and helpers
> @@ -277,7 +275,6 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(raw_spinlock, raw_spinlock_t, false, s->lock, raw_s
> SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(spinlock, spinlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, spin, spin_lock(s->lock))
> SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(rwlock, rwlock_t, __SEQ_RT, s->lock, read, read_lock(s->lock))
> SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock))
> -SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mutex, ww_mutex_lock(s->lock, NULL))
>
> /*
> * SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO - static initializer for seqcount_LOCKNAME_t
> @@ -304,8 +301,7 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
> __seqprop_case((s), raw_spinlock, prop), \
> __seqprop_case((s), spinlock, prop), \
> __seqprop_case((s), rwlock, prop), \
> - __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop), \
> - __seqprop_case((s), ww_mutex, prop))
> + __seqprop_case((s), mutex, prop))
>
> #define seqprop_ptr(s) __seqprop(s, ptr)
> #define seqprop_sequence(s) __seqprop(s, sequence)
> --
> 2.25.1
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch