Re: [PATCH v5 01/22] KVM: arm64: Introduce template for inline functions

From: Oliver Upton
Date: Tue Mar 22 2022 - 15:43:09 EST


Hi Gavin,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The inline functions used to get the SMCCC parameters have same
> layout. It means these functions can be presented by an unified
> template, to make the code simplified. Besides, this adds more
> similar inline functions like smccc_get_arg{4,5,6,7,8}() to get
> more SMCCC arguments, which are needed by SDEI virtualization
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h b/include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h
> index 0e2509d27910..d5144c852fe4 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_hypercalls.h
> @@ -13,20 +13,20 @@ static inline u32 smccc_get_function(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long smccc_get_arg1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1);
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long smccc_get_arg2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 2);
> +#define SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(reg) \
> +static inline unsigned long smccc_get_arg##reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) \
> +{ \
> + return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg); \
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long smccc_get_arg3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 3);
> -}
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(1)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(2)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(3)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(4)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(5)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(6)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(7)
> +SMCCC_DECLARE_GET_ARG(8)

Hmm. What if we specify a single inline function where the caller passes
the arg # as a parameter? We really just want to abstract away the
off-by-one difference between GP registers and SMCCC arguments.

Macros generally make me uneasy for template functions, but I may be in
the vocal minority on this topic :)

--
Thanks,
Oliver