Re: [PATCH] uvc: fix missing check to determine if element is found in list

From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Tue Mar 22 2022 - 09:10:47 EST


On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 01:40:07PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Hi Xiaomeng
>
> Thanks for the patch. Maybe it would be better to just make a function
> to find the ITERM entity with a given id?

We already have a uvc_entity_by_id() which could be used for that, but
only for the second loop iteration. The first one finds any input
terminal. Also, the second loop restricts the search to a chain, while
uvc_entity_by_id() it global to the device. I think the proposed patch
is fine.

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 16:33, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> >
> > The list iterator will point to a bogus position containing HEAD if
> > the list is empty or the element is not found in list. This case
> > should be checked before any use of the iterator, otherwise it will
> > lead to a invalid memory access. The missing check here is before
> > "pin = iterm->id;", just add check here to fix the security bug.
> >
> > In addition, the list iterator value will *always* be set and non-NULL
> > by list_for_each_entry(), so it is incorrect to assume that the iterator
> > value will be NULL if the element is not found in list, considering
> > the (mis)use here: "if (iterm == NULL".
> >
> > Use a new value 'it' as the list iterator, while use the old value
> > 'iterm' as a dedicated pointer to point to the found element, which
> > 1. can fix this bug, due to 'iterm' is NULL only if it's not found.
> > 2. do not need to change all the uses of 'iterm' after the loop.
> > 3. can also limit the scope of the list iterator 'it' *only inside*
> > the traversal loop by simply declaring 'it' inside the loop in the
> > future, as usage of the iterator outside of the list_for_each_entry
> > is considered harmful. https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/2/17/1032

Looking forward to that :-)

> > Fixes: d5e90b7a6cd1c ("[media] uvcvideo: Move to video_ioctl2")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > index 711556d13d03..e7cdc01ad277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > @@ -871,6 +871,7 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_enum_input(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > struct uvc_video_chain *chain = handle->chain;
> > const struct uvc_entity *selector = chain->selector;
> > struct uvc_entity *iterm = NULL;
> > + struct uvc_entity *it;
> > u32 index = input->index;
> > int pin = 0;
> >
> > @@ -878,22 +879,27 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_enum_input(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > (chain->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_IGNORE_SELECTOR_UNIT)) {
> > if (index != 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - list_for_each_entry(iterm, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > - if (UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(iterm))
> > + list_for_each_entry(it, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > + if (UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(it)) {
> > + iterm = it;
> > break;
> > + }
> > }
> > - pin = iterm->id;
> > + if (iterm)
> > + pin = iterm->id;

You can drop this, pin is not used anymore in the rest of the function.

> > } else if (index < selector->bNrInPins) {
> > pin = selector->baSourceID[index];
> > - list_for_each_entry(iterm, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > - if (!UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(iterm))
> > + list_for_each_entry(it, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > + if (!UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(it))
> > continue;
> > - if (iterm->id == pin)
> > + if (it->id == pin) {

And here you could use
if (it->id == selector->baSourceID[index]) {

and drop the local pin variable.

If you're fine with those small changes I can handle them when applying
the patch to my tree.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > + iterm = it;
> > break;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (iterm == NULL || iterm->id != pin)
> > + if (iterm == NULL)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > memset(input, 0, sizeof(*input));

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart