Re: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: pci: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration

From: Xu Yilun
Date: Fri Mar 18 2022 - 06:42:08 EST


On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:59:38AM +0000, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.

The code change is good to me, but maybe the commit message could be
improved. The reference [1] is not the best to make things clear, maybe
[2] could be better undstood. It is even better if there is a brief
introduction of the DMA API change in the commit message. It saves a lot
of time for reviewers.

I see there are plenty of similar places to change, could you make a
patchset and change them in a batch?

[2]: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2019-February/033674.html

Thanks,
Yilun

>
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> index 717ac9715970..42fdfa7a28d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> @@ -356,8 +356,6 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> pci_set_master(pcidev);
>
> ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> - if (ret)
> - ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n");
> goto disable_error_report_exit;
> --
> 2.25.1