Re: [for-next][PATCH 03/13] fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:49 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:03:33 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Do I understand correctly that this patch set was applied in your
> > tree? I was under the impression that we agreed to route this through
> > the bpf-next tree earlier (see [0]), but I might have misunderstood
> > something, sorry.
> >
> > Either way, the reason it matters is because Jiri's multi-attach
> > kprobe patch set ([1]) is depending on Masami's patches and having
> > fprobe patches in bpf-next tree would simplify logistics
> > significantly.
>
> I knew Jiri's patches were to go through the bpf tree, but I missed that
> those were dependent on this and you wanted these to go through as well.
>
> I had just finished my automated tests that ran these patches. I haven't
> pushed them to my next branch yet so I can hold them off. I don't have
> anything dependent on them.

Excellent. Thanks for testing.

> Would you be able to take these for-next patches directly (as they all have
> been tested) and you can switch my signed-off-by to Reviewed-by.
>
> The first of the series is unrelated and will go through my tree. That's
> the user_events patch.

Right.
We're talking about this set:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/164735281449.1084943.12438881786173547153.stgit@devnote2/

I believe it has a small doc difference vs what you've tested.
Looks like our CI is green on it too.
We'll do additional testing and add your SOB and Tested-by
before pushing.

Thanks!