Re: [PATCHv6 27/30] x86/kvm: Make SWIOTLB buffer shared for TD guest

[Dave Hansen]

On 3/15/22 19:08, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Intel TDX doesn't allow VMM to directly access guest private memory.
> Any memory that is required for communication with the VMM must be
> shared explicitly. The same rule applies for any DMA to and from the
> TDX guest. All DMA pages have to be marked as shared pages. A generic way
> to achieve this without any changes to device drivers is to use the
> SWIOTLB framework.
> 
> Make SWIOTLB buffer shared by generalizing mem_encrypt_init() to cover
> TDX.

This could have saved me a trip to the console if it would have also said:

	Stop selecting DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK directly.  It will get set
	indirectly by selcting X86_MEM_ENCRYPT.

It's probably also worth noting:

	mem_encrypt_init() is currently under an AMD-specific #ifdef.  	
	Move it to a more generic area of the header.

The other adorable thing about this patch:

>  arch/x86/Kconfig                   | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/coco/core.c               | 1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 6 +++---
>  arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c          | 9 ++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Is that it superficially has *zero* to do with SWIOTLB, also known as
the declared Subject.  It almost looks like this patch found a smaller
and weaker patch, beat it up, and stole its Subject.

I'd be fine with an "x86/mm" tag on this too.  I'm not sure what makes
it truly KVM-specific.

Can you send a revision with something a bit more descriptive, please?