Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] driver core: Add dma_cleanup callback in bus_type

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 01:04:00PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > 
> > > 1 - tmp->driver is non-NULL because tmp is already bound.
> > >   1.a - If tmp->driver->driver_managed_dma == 0, the group must currently be
> > > DMA-API-owned as a whole. Regardless of what driver dev has unbound from,
> > > its removal does not release someone else's DMA API (co-)ownership.
> > 
> > This is an uncommon locking pattern, but it does work. It relies on
> > the mutex being an effective synchronization barrier for an unlocked
> > store:
> > 
> > 				      WRITE_ONCE(dev->driver, NULL)
> 
> Only the driver core should be messing with the dev->driver pointer as
> when it does so, it already has the proper locks held.  Do I need to
> move that to a "private" location so that nothing outside of the driver
> core can mess with it?

It would be nice, I've seen a abuse and mislocking of it in drivers

Jason