Re: [PATCH] bpf: move the bpf syscall sysctl table to its own module

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:35:29AM +0800, Yan Zhu wrote:
> +static struct ctl_table bpf_syscall_table[] = {
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "unprivileged_bpf_disabled",
> +		.data		= &sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= bpf_unpriv_handler,
> +		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
> +		.extra2		= SYSCTL_TWO,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "bpf_stats_enabled",
> +		.data		= &bpf_stats_enabled_key.key,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(bpf_stats_enabled_key),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= bpf_stats_handler,
> +	},
> +	{ }
> +};

No progress towards a counted array instead of a NULL terminated one?