Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/bridge: use atomic enable/disable for bridge callbacks

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Vinod Polimera (2022-02-21 06:51:24)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
> index b32295a..5c7dc82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
> @@ -102,30 +136,82 @@ static void panel_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>                 drm_connector_cleanup(connector);
>  }
>
> -static void panel_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void panel_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +               struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>         struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
> +       struct drm_atomic_state *old_state = old_bridge_state->base.state;
> +       struct drm_encoder *encoder = bridge->encoder;
> +       struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> +       struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> +
> +       crtc = bridge_drm_get_new_connector_crtc(encoder, old_state);
> +       if (!crtc)
> +               return;
> +
> +       old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(old_state, crtc);
> +       if (old_crtc_state && old_crtc_state->self_refresh_active)

Can you please add some comment about why self_refresh_active means we
should bail out from this function? Such a comment would be helpful to
understand the code quickly vs. having to figure out what the intention
of the logic is. The analogix driver has

/* Don't touch the panel if we're coming back from PSR */

so even mentioning PSR here would be helpful.