Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: add Energy Model bindings

[Lukasz Luba]

On 2/22/22 09:45, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-02-22, 08:06, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > I'm not sure if that would be flexible enough to meet the requirement:
> > power for each OPP might be different in one board vs. other board.
>
> Don't DT files overload values from board files all the time ? Why wouldn't the
> same apply for OPP table as well ?

In that SoC and family of the boards, there are no such examples.
It used to be popular in arm32 boards, but I'm not sure nowadays.

> > AFAIK the OPP definition is more SoC specific.
>
> This isn't about OPP definition as well, but just that if DT allows you to
> override or not. I think it will.

Redefining the whole OPP table, when the freq, voltage, interconnect,
and other old entries don't change isn't too messy?

As I said, I would prefer something lightweight, not redefining all
stuff from OPP in every board file.