linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the fscrypt tree

[broonie]

Hi all,

FIXME: Add owner of second tree to To:
       Add author(s)/SOB of conflicting commits.

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  fs/iomap/direct-io.c

between commit:

  489734ef94f4f ("iomap: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto")

from the fscrypt tree and commit:

  07888c665b405 ("block: pass a block_device and opf to bio_alloc")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.