Re: [PATCH 02/29] x86/module: Fix the paravirt vs alternative order

From: Josh Poimboeuf
Date: Fri Feb 18 2022 - 18:28:52 EST


On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:22:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:28:20PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 05:49:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Ever since commit 4e6292114c741 ("x86/paravirt: Add new features for
> > > paravirt patching") there is an ordering dependency between patching
> > > paravirt ops and patching alternatives, the module loader still
> > > violates this.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4e6292114c741 ("x86/paravirt: Add new features for paravirt patching")
> > > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Probably a good idea to put the 'para' and 'alt' clauses next to each
> > other and add a comment that the ordering is necessary.
>
> Can't, retpolines must be in between, but I'll add a comment to check
> alternative.c for ordering constraints.

Ah, even more justification for a comment then ;-)

--
Josh