Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: free vfsmount through rcu work from kern_unmount

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Fri Feb 18 2022 - 14:33:44 EST


On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 19:26 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 01:31:13PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > After kern_unmount returns, callers can no longer access the
> > vfsmount structure. However, the vfsmount structure does need
> > to be kept around until the end of the RCU grace period, to
> > make sure other accesses have all gone away too.
> >
> > This can be accomplished by either gating each kern_unmount
> > on synchronize_rcu (the comment in the code says it all), or
> > by deferring the freeing until the next grace period, where
> > it needs to be handled in a workqueue due to the locking in
> > mntput_no_expire().
>
> NAK.  There's code that relies upon kern_unmount() being
> synchronous.  That's precisely the reason why MNT_INTERNAL
> is treated that way in mntput_no_expire().

Fair enough. Should I make a kern_unmount_rcu() version
that gets called just from mq_put_mnt()?

--
All Rights Reversed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part