Re: [v3 11/13] iio: imu: add BNO055 serdev driver

From: kernel test robot
Date: Thu Feb 17 2022 - 14:48:23 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: Move VM's worker kthreads back to the original cgroup before exiting."
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[ulfh-mmc:next 20/24] drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c:158:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'bitmap_weight_eq'; did you mean 'bitmap_weight'?"
In reply to: Andrea Merello: "[v3 11/13] iio: imu: add BNO055 serdev driver"
Next in thread: kernel test robot: "Re: [v3 11/13] iio: imu: add BNO055 serdev driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Andrea,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on jic23-iio/togreg]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master linus/master v5.17-rc4 next-20220217]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrea-Merello/Add-support-for-Bosch-BNO055-IMU/20220218-002932
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220218/202202180353.lRcys4tc-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/98d7db4486f0404718da9e85ae13da54d757104b
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Andrea-Merello/Add-support-for-Bosch-BNO055-IMU/20220218-002932
git checkout 98d7db4486f0404718da9e85ae13da54d757104b
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=alpha SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/iio/imu/bno055/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:285:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'bno055_calibration_load' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
285 | int bno055_calibration_load(struct bno055_priv *priv, const u8 *data, int len)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:555,
from include/linux/kernel.h:29,
from include/linux/clk.h:13,
from drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:18:
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c: In function 'bno055_calibration_load':
>> drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:288:36: warning: format '%zu' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 4 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
288 | dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Invalid calibration file size %zu (expected %d)",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:134:29: note: in definition of macro '__dynamic_func_call'
134 | func(&id, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:166:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call'
166 | _dynamic_func_call(fmt,__dynamic_dev_dbg, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:155:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dynamic_dev_dbg'
155 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:155:30: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_fmt'
155 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:288:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_dbg'
288 | dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Invalid calibration file size %zu (expected %d)",
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:288:69: note: format string is defined here
288 | dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Invalid calibration file size %zu (expected %d)",
| ~~^
| |
| long unsigned int
| %u
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c: At top level:
>> drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:748:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'bno055_sysfs_attr_avail' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
748 | int bno055_sysfs_attr_avail(struct bno055_priv *priv, struct bno055_sysfs_attr *attr,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c:1203:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'bno055_debugfs_reg_access' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1203 | int bno055_debugfs_reg_access(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, unsigned int reg,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/device.h:15,
from drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:18:
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c: In function 'bno055_sl_read_reg':
>> drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:305:45: warning: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' {aka 'long unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
305 | dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev, "Invalid read valsize %d",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:30: note: in definition of macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
110 | _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:144:56: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_fmt'
144 | dev_printk_index_wrap(_dev_err, KERN_ERR, dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:305:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_err'
305 | dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev, "Invalid read valsize %d",
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:305:68: note: format string is defined here
305 | dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev, "Invalid read valsize %d",
| ~^
| |
| int
| %ld
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:555,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/alpha/include/asm/bug.h:23,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:13,
from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
from ./arch/alpha/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:55,
from include/linux/swait.h:7,
from include/linux/completion.h:12,
from drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:17:
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:311:37: warning: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t' {aka 'long unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
311 | dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "rd reg 0x%x (len %d)", reg_addr, val_size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:134:29: note: in definition of macro '__dynamic_func_call'
134 | func(&id, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:166:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call'
166 | _dynamic_func_call(fmt,__dynamic_dev_dbg, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:155:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dynamic_dev_dbg'
155 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:155:30: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_fmt'
155 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:311:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_dbg'
311 | dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "rd reg 0x%x (len %d)", reg_addr, val_size);
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:311:56: note: format string is defined here
311 | dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "rd reg 0x%x (len %d)", reg_addr, val_size);
| ~^
| |
| int
| %ld
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:555,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/alpha/include/asm/bug.h:23,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:13,
from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
from ./arch/alpha/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:55,
from include/linux/swait.h:7,
from include/linux/completion.h:12,
from drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:17:
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c: In function 'bno055_sl_receive_buf':
>> drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:387:37: warning: field width specifier '*' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t' {aka 'long unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
387 | dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "recv (len %zu): %*ph ", size, size, buf);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:134:29: note: in definition of macro '__dynamic_func_call'
134 | func(&id, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:166:9: note: in expansion of macro '_dynamic_func_call'
166 | _dynamic_func_call(fmt,__dynamic_dev_dbg, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:155:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dynamic_dev_dbg'
155 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:155:30: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_fmt'
155 | dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:387:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_dbg'
387 | dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "recv (len %zu): %*ph ", size, size, buf);
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c:387:55: note: format string is defined here
387 | dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "recv (len %zu): %*ph ", size, size, buf);
| ~^~
| |
| int

vim +305 drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055_sl.c

295
296 static int bno055_sl_read_reg(void *context,
297 const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
298 void *val, size_t val_size)
299 {
300 int ret;
301 int reg_addr;
302 struct bno055_sl_priv *priv = context;
303
304 if (val_size > 128) {
> 305 dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev, "Invalid read valsize %d",
306 val_size);
307 return -EINVAL;
308 }
309
310 reg_addr = ((u8 *)reg)[0];
311 dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "rd reg 0x%x (len %d)", reg_addr, val_size);
312 mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
313 priv->expected_data_len = val_size;
314 priv->response_buf = val;
315 mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
316
317 ret = bno_sl_send_cmd(priv, 1, reg_addr, val_size, NULL);
318
319 mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
320 priv->response_buf = NULL;
321 mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
322
323 return ret;
324 }
325
326 /*
327 * Handler for received data; this is called from the reicever callback whenever
328 * it got some packet from the serial bus. The status tell us whether the
329 * packet is valid (i.e. header ok && received payload len consistent wrt the
330 * header). It's now our responsability to check whether this is what we
331 * expected, of whether we got some unexpected, yet valid, packet.
332 */
333 static void bno055_sl_handle_rx(struct bno055_sl_priv *priv, int status)
334 {
335 mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
336 switch (priv->expect_response) {
337 case CMD_NONE:
338 dev_warn(&priv->serdev->dev, "received unexpected, yet valid, data from sensor");
339 mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
340 return;
341
342 case CMD_READ:
343 priv->cmd_status = status;
344 if (status == STATUS_OK &&
345 priv->rx.databuf_count != priv->expected_data_len) {
346 /*
347 * If we got here, then the lower layer serial protocol
348 * seems consistent with itself; if we got an unexpected
349 * amount of data then signal it as a non critical error
350 */
351 priv->cmd_status = STATUS_FAIL;
352 dev_warn(&priv->serdev->dev, "received an unexpected amount of, yet valid, data from sensor");
353 }
354 break;
355
356 case CMD_WRITE:
357 priv->cmd_status = status;
358 break;
359 }
360
361 priv->expect_response = CMD_NONE;
362 complete(&priv->cmd_complete);
363 mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
364 }
365
366 /*
367 * Serdev receiver FSM. This tracks the serial communication and parse the
368 * header. It pushes packets to bno055_sl_handle_rx(), eventually communicating
369 * failures (i.e. malformed packets).
370 * Ideally it doesn't know anything about upper layer (i.e. if this is the
371 * packet we were really expecting), but since we copies the payload into the
372 * receiver buffer (that is not valid when i.e. we don't expect data), we
373 * snoop a bit in the upper layer..
374 * Also, we assume to RX one pkt per time (i.e. the HW doesn't send anything
375 * unless we require to AND we don't queue more than one request per time).
376 */
377 static int bno055_sl_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev,
378 const unsigned char *buf, size_t size)
379 {
380 int status;
381 struct bno055_sl_priv *priv = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
382 int remaining = size;
383
384 if (size == 0)
385 return 0;
386
> 387 dev_dbg(&priv->serdev->dev, "recv (len %zu): %*ph ", size, size, buf);
388 switch (priv->rx.state) {
389 case RX_IDLE:
390 /*
391 * New packet.
392 * Check for its 1st byte, that identifies the pkt type.
393 */
394 if (buf[0] != 0xEE && buf[0] != 0xBB) {
395 dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev,
396 "Invalid packet start %x", buf[0]);
397 bno055_sl_handle_rx(priv, STATUS_CRIT);
398 break;
399 }
400 priv->rx.type = buf[0];
401 priv->rx.state = RX_START;
402 remaining--;
403 buf++;
404 priv->rx.databuf_count = 0;
405 fallthrough;
406
407 case RX_START:
408 /*
409 * Packet RX in progress, we expect either 1-byte len or 1-byte
410 * status depending by the packet type.
411 */
412 if (remaining == 0)
413 break;
414
415 if (priv->rx.type == 0xEE) {
416 if (remaining > 1) {
417 dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev, "EE pkt. Extra data received");
418 status = STATUS_CRIT;
419
420 } else {
421 status = (buf[0] == 1) ? STATUS_OK : STATUS_FAIL;
422 }
423 bno055_sl_handle_rx(priv, status);
424 priv->rx.state = RX_IDLE;
425 break;
426
427 } else {
428 /*priv->rx.type == 0xBB */
429 priv->rx.state = RX_DATA;
430 priv->rx.expected_len = buf[0];
431 remaining--;
432 buf++;
433 }
434 fallthrough;
435
436 case RX_DATA:
437 /* Header parsed; now receiving packet data payload */
438 if (remaining == 0)
439 break;
440
441 if (priv->rx.databuf_count + remaining > priv->rx.expected_len) {
442 /*
443 * This is a inconsistency in serial protocol, we lost
444 * sync and we don't know how to handle further data
445 */
446 dev_err(&priv->serdev->dev, "BB pkt. Extra data received");
447 bno055_sl_handle_rx(priv, STATUS_CRIT);
448 priv->rx.state = RX_IDLE;
449 break;
450 }
451
452 mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
453 /*
454 * NULL e.g. when read cmd is stale or when no read cmd is
455 * actually pending.
456 */
457 if (priv->response_buf &&
458 /*
459 * Snoop on the upper layer protocol stuff to make sure not
460 * to write to an invalid memory. Apart for this, let's the
461 * upper layer manage any inconsistency wrt expected data
462 * len (as long as the serial protocol is consistent wrt
463 * itself (i.e. response header is consistent with received
464 * response len.
465 */
466 (priv->rx.databuf_count + remaining <= priv->expected_data_len))
467 memcpy(priv->response_buf + priv->rx.databuf_count,
468 buf, remaining);
469 mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
470
471 priv->rx.databuf_count += remaining;
472
473 /*
474 * Reached expected len advertised by the IMU for the current
475 * packet. Pass it to the upper layer (for us it is just valid).
476 */
477 if (priv->rx.databuf_count == priv->rx.expected_len) {
478 bno055_sl_handle_rx(priv, STATUS_OK);
479 priv->rx.state = RX_IDLE;
480 }
481 break;
482 }
483
484 return size;
485 }
486

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Next message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: Move VM's worker kthreads back to the original cgroup before exiting."
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[ulfh-mmc:next 20/24] drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c:158:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'bitmap_weight_eq'; did you mean 'bitmap_weight'?"
In reply to: Andrea Merello: "[v3 11/13] iio: imu: add BNO055 serdev driver"
Next in thread: kernel test robot: "Re: [v3 11/13] iio: imu: add BNO055 serdev driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]