Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drivers/net/virtio_net: Added basic RSS support.

From: Andrew Melnichenko
Date: Thu Feb 17 2022 - 14:02:51 EST


Hi all,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:09 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -3113,13 +3270,14 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > u16 max_queue_pairs;
> > > > int mtu;
> > > >
> > > > - /* Find if host supports multiqueue virtio_net device */
> > > > - err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ,
> > > > - struct virtio_net_config,
> > > > - max_virtqueue_pairs, &max_queue_pairs);
> > > > + /* Find if host supports multiqueue/rss virtio_net device */
> > > > + max_queue_pairs = 1;
> > > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) || virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS))
> > > > + max_queue_pairs =
> > > > + virtio_cread16(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, max_virtqueue_pairs));
> > >
> > > Instead of testing either feature and treating them as somewhat equal,
> > > shouldn't RSS be dependent on MQ?
> >
> > No, RSS is dependent on CTRL_VQ. Technically RSS and MQ are similar features.
>
> RSS depends on having multiple queues.
>
> What would enabling VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS without VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ do?

RSS would work.

According to virtio spec article 5.1.6.5.5:
> A device MAY support one of these features or both. The driver MAY negotiate any set of these features
> that the device supports.

Also, in 5.1.3.1:
> VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS Requires VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ.

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > /* We need at least 2 queue's */
> > > > - if (err || max_queue_pairs < VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_MIN ||
> > > > + if (max_queue_pairs < VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_MIN ||
> > > > max_queue_pairs > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_MAX ||
> > > > !virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
> > > > max_queue_pairs = 1;
> > > > @@ -3207,6 +3365,23 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF))
> > > > vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
> > > >
> > > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS)) {
> > > > + vi->has_rss = true;
> > > > + vi->rss_indir_table_size =
> > > > + virtio_cread16(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
> > > > + rss_max_indirection_table_length));
> > > > + vi->rss_key_size =
> > > > + virtio_cread8(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, rss_max_key_size));
> > > > +
> > > > + vi->rss_hash_types_supported =
> > > > + virtio_cread32(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, supported_hash_types));
> > > > + vi->rss_hash_types_supported &=
> > > > + ~(VIRTIO_NET_RSS_HASH_TYPE_IP_EX |
> > > > + VIRTIO_NET_RSS_HASH_TYPE_TCP_EX |
> > > > + VIRTIO_NET_RSS_HASH_TYPE_UDP_EX);
> > > > +
> > > > + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
> > >
> > > Only make the feature visible when the hash is actually reported in
> > > the skb, patch 3.
> >
> > VirtioNET has two features: RSS(steering only) and hash(hash report in
> > vnet header)
> > Both features may be enabled/disabled separately:
> > 1. rss on and hash off - packets steered to the corresponding vqs
> > 2. rss off and hash on - packets steered by tap(like mq) but headers
> > have properly calculated hash.
> > 3. rss on and hash on - packets steered to corresponding vqs and hash
> > is present in the header.
> >
> > RXHASH feature allows the user to enable/disable the rss/hash(any combination).
>
> I find that confusing, but.. I see that there is prior art where some
> drivers enable/disable entire RSS load balancing based on this flag.
> So ok.
>
> > I think it's a good idea to leave RXHASH in patch 2/4 to give the user
> > ability to manipulate the rss only feature.
> > But, if you think that it requires to move it to the 3/4, I'll do it.
> >
> > >
> > > Also, clearly separate the feature patches (2) rss, (3) rxhash, (4)
> > > rxhash config.
> >
> > Currently:
> > Patch 2/4 - adds VirtioNet rss feature.
> > Patch 3/4 - adds VirtioNet hash report feature.
> > Patch 4/4 - adds the ability to manipulate supported hash types.
> >
> > Can you provide more detailed suggestions on how to move hunks?
>
> I gave one in the follow-on patch, to which you responded. That's probably it.

I'll add zero size table check and move hunk for padded header length
from 3/4 to 1/4.