RE: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: remove clk_scaling_lock when clkscaling isn't supported.

[Kiwoong Kim]

> The name of clk_scaling_lock has explained everything, for the platform
> which doesn't support load-based clk scaling, doesn't need to hold this
> lock.
> 
> Acked-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Okay, thank you for your information.
I still have no idea of why the lock is required for ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd from the UFS specification w/o any featuring.