Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: introduce SO_RCVBUFAUTO to let the rcv_buf tune automatically

From: Jason Xing
Date: Wed Feb 16 2022 - 21:16:38 EST

Next message: Prashant Malani: "Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] platform/chrome: cros_ec: determine `wake_enabled` in cros_ec_suspend()"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[ammarfaizi2-block:dhowells/linux-fs/netfs-maple 29/42] fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:28:26: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (((1UL) << 12) - offset) *' (aka 'unsigned long *') and 'typeof (size) *' (aka 'unsigned int *'))"
In reply to: Eric Dumazet: "Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: introduce SO_RCVBUFAUTO to let the rcv_buf tune automatically"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 12:56 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:58 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Just now, I found out that the latest kernel has merged a similar
> > patch (commit 04190bf89) about three months ago.
>
> There you go :)
>
> >
> > Is it still necessary to add another separate option to clear the
> > SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK explicitly?
>
> What do you mean, SO_BUF_LOCK is all that is needed.

Yeah, I think SO_BUF_LOCK is enough and we don't have to add a new
option like SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK as we've talked about before. Thanks,
Eric.