Re: race between vfs_rename and do_linkat (mv and link)

From: Al Viro
Date: Tue Feb 15 2022 - 08:37:46 EST


On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:56:29AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> Doing "lock_rename() + lookup last components" would fix this race.

No go - thanks to the possibility of AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW there.
Think of it - we'd need to
* lock parents (both at the same time)
* look up the last component of source
* if it turns a symlink - unlock parents and repeat the entire
thing for its body, except when asked not to.
* when we are done with the source, look the last component of
target up

... and then there is sodding -ESTALE handling, with all the elegance
that brings in.

> If this was only done on retry, then that would prevent possible
> performance regressions, at the cost of extra complexity.

Extra compared to the above, that is. How delightful...