Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] pwm: dt-bindings: Include generic pwm schema

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 15/02/2022 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 08:40, Uwe Kleine-König
> > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> [dropped Anson Huang and Yash Shah from Cc: which were not reachable for
> > >> my last mail]
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Changes since v1:
> > >>> 1. Add tags.
> > >>> 2. Adjust subject (Uwe).
> > >>
> > >> However you only took a part of my suggestion ...
> > >>
> > >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (15):
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: Include generic pwm schema
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> > >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> > >>
> > >> ... The actual patch has a space after the comma, I like this variant
> > >> without comma better as this is a compatible string.
> > > 
> > > I am confused. My patch does not have comma after space. Your reply
> > > had such in the subject, but not in the proposed new subject you wrote
> > > in msg, so I left it as is. Without comma. If you still see comma, it
> > > is something with your mail client.
> > > 
> > > See:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214212154.8853-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> > > 
> > > Also reply from Vijayakannan does not have comma:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m80af695f2c751341bc971114aefa00ccc929a3ec
> 
> Strange: I have this mail four times in my mailboxes (via
> linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and directly). In the
> two latter the Subject line is broken in two:

I was wrong. The ones to kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and the linux-arm-kernel
one are the ones with the linebreak.

Hmm,

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717310.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717304.html

has the linebreaks, too. Still I wonder what is different between
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature