Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] drm/lsdc: add drm driver for loongson display controller

From: Sui Jingfeng
Date: Mon Feb 14 2022 - 22:28:44 EST



On 2022/2/14 18:10, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:16:43PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
From: suijingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>

There is a display controller in loongson's LS2K1000 SoC and LS7A1000
bridge chip, the DC is a PCI device in those chips. It has two display
pipes but with only one hardware cursor. Each way has a DVO interface
which provide RGB888 signals, vertical & horizontal synchronisations,
data enable and the pixel clock. Each CRTC is able to scanout from
1920x1080 resolution at 60Hz. The maxmium resolution is 2048x2048
according to the hardware spec.

Loongson display controllers are simple which require scanout buffers
to be physically contiguous. LS2K1000 is a SOC, Only system memory is
available. Therefore CMA helper based driver is intended to be use,
although it is possible to use VRAM helper based solution by carving
out part of system memory as VRAM.

On LS7A1000/LS7A2000 bridge chip, the DC is equipped with a dedicated
video memory which is typically 64MB or more. In this case, VRAM helper
based solution which scanout from local VRAM is reconmended to use.
It is reliable to use for massive production, but CMA based helper
solution is still usable on ls7a1000 and ls7a2000, at the price of
the CRTC must access the FB in RAM through the PCIe bus and HT3.0 bus.
This causes continuous traffic on the bus regardless of whether the FB
image is updating or not. Sadly, it suffer from screen flickering under
RAM pressure on LS7A1000. Luckily, It show extremely good condition on
LS7A2000 even under stressapptest, Maybe the hardware engineer resolve
this issue. Integrating two distict helpers based driver into one piece
allow code sharing.

We have also implemented demage update on top of CMA helper which copy
the demaged region from the shadow framebuffer in system RAM to the real
framebuffer in VRAM manually. This is intend to overcome the screen
flicking issue on LS7A1000, but the performance is not good.
Using "lsdc.dirty_update=1" in the kernel commmand line if you would like
to have a try.

For LS7A1000, there are 4 dedicated GPIOs whose control register is
located at the DC register space, They are used to emulate two way i2c.
One for DVO0, another for DVO1. This is the reason why this driver is
not switch to drm bridge framework yet. LS2K1000 and LS2K0500 SoC don't
have such GPIO hardwared, they grab i2c adapter from other module,
either general purpose GPIO emulated i2c or hardware i2c adapter.
Drm bridge and drm panel driver for the external encoder is suitable for
those SoC. We have already implemented this on our downstream 4.19.190
kernel. But due to the GPIO, PWM and I2C device driver support for
LS2K1000 is not upstreamed yet, this driver still can be use to bring
the graphic environment up by providing display timings or similar things
in the device tree.

The DC in LS7A1000 has only one hardware cursor, we simply let the two
CRTC share it. The DC in LS7A2000 have two cursor, two built-in hdmi
encoder and one transparent vga encoder and more, surport for LS7A2000
is on the way. In short, we have built-in gpio emulated i2c support,
we also have hardware cursor support. LS7A2000 The kind of tiny drivers
in drm/tiny is not suitable for us.

+------+ +-----------------------------------+
| DDR4 | | +-------------------+ |
+------+ | | PCIe Root complex | LS7A1000 |
|| MC0 | +--++---------++----+ |
+----------+ HT 3.0 | || || |
| LS3A4000 |<-------->| +---++---+ +--++--+ +---------+ +------+
| CPU |<-------->| | GC1000 | | LSDC |<-->| DDR3 MC |<->| VRAM |
+----------+ | +--------+ +-+--+-+ +---------+ +------+
|| MC1 +---------------|--|----------------+
+------+ | |
| DDR4 | +-------+ DVO0 | | DVO1 +------+
+------+ VGA <--|ADV7125|<--------+ +-------->|TFP410|--> DVI/HDMI
+-------+ +------+

The above picture give a simple usage of LS7A1000, note that the encoder
is not necessary adv7125 or tfp410, it is a choice of the downstream board
manufacturer. Other candicate encoders can be ch7034b, sil9022 and ite66121
lt8618 etc. Besides, the DC in both ls2k1000 and ls7k1000 has the same of
PCI vendor id and pci device id. Both is 0x0014:0x7a06, the reverison id
is also same. This is the firmware engineer's mistake, but such firmware
and various boards ship with such firmware already released. We choose to
deduce the chip's identification from information provided by device tree.
For lsdc, there is only a 1:1 mapping of encoders and connectors.

v2: fixup warnings reported by kernel test robot

v3: fix more grammar mistakes in Kconfig reported by Randy Dunlap and give
more details about lsdc.

v4:
1) Add dts required and explain why device tree is required.
2) Give more description about lsdc and vram helper base driver.
3) Fix warnings reported by kernel test robot.
4) Introduce stride_alignment member into struct lsdc_chip_desc, the
stride alignment is 256 bytes for ls7a1000, ls2k1000 and ls2k0500.
But ls7a2000 improve it to 32 bytes, for extend the support for the
device on coming

v5:
1) using writel and readl replace writeq and readq, to fix kernel test
robot report build error on other archtecture
2) set default fb format to XRGB8888 at crtc reset time.
3) fix typos.

v6:
1) Explain why we are not switch to drm dridge subsystem on ls2k1000.
2) Explain why tiny drm driver is not suitable for us.
3) Give a short description of the trival dirty uppdate implement based
on CMA helper.
4) code clean up

v7:
1) Remove select I2C_GPIO and I2C_LS2X in Kconfig, it is not ready now
2) Licensing issues are fixed suggested by Krzysztof Kozlowski.
3) lsdc_pixpll_print() is removed, part of it move to debugfs.
4) Set prefer_shadow to true if vram based driver is in using.
5) Replace double blank lines with single line in all files
6) Verbose cmd line parameter is replaced with drm_dbg()
7) All warnnings reported by ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict are fixed
8) Get edid from dtb support is removed as suggested by Maxime Ripard
9) Fix typos and various improvement
you *need* to have a DT bindings description

Ok, I know that, it takes some time to document it though.