Re: [PATCH 10/15] dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: do not require pwm-cells

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon Feb 14 2022 - 12:19:30 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[intel-tdx:kvm-upstream-workaround 3/145] arch/x86/include/asm/seam.h: asm/processor.h is included more than once."
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH 5/8] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "[PATCH 10/15] dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: do not require pwm-cells"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "[PATCH 06/15] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: include generic pwm schema"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2/14/22 12:16 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> pwm-cells are already required by pwm.yaml schema.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Florian

Next message: kernel test robot: "[intel-tdx:kvm-upstream-workaround 3/145] arch/x86/include/asm/seam.h: asm/processor.h is included more than once."
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH 5/8] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "[PATCH 10/15] dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: do not require pwm-cells"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "[PATCH 06/15] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: include generic pwm schema"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]