Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/02/2022 17:43, Mark Brown wrote:

> >> +    required:
> >> +      - regulator-name

> > Why is regulator-name required?  While it's a good idea for users to
> > document names for supplies on their boards it shouldn't be a
> > requirement or something that a driver would care about.

> Indeed, there is no need for requiring the name. I guess I copied it
> from other schemas.

Those other schemas should be fixed as well, if this is required for
anything then there's a problem - this is purely diagnostic information
for users.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature