Re: [PATCH v8] kallsyms: new /proc/kallmodsyms with builtin modules

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Fri Feb 11 2022 - 17:37:06 EST


On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:43:03PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
> The kallmodsyms patch series was originally posted in Nov 2019, and the thread
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/20191114223036.9359-1-eugene.loh@xxxxxxxxxx/t/#u)
> shows review comments, questions, and feedback from interested parties.
>
> All review comments have been satisfied, as far as I know: in particular
> Yamada's note about translation units that are shared between built-in modules
> is satisfied with a better representation which is also much, much smaller.
>
> A kernel tree containing this series alone, atop -rc3:
> https://github.com/oracle/dtrace-linux-kernel kallmodsyms/5.17-rc3
>
> Trees for trying this out, if you want to try this series in conjunction
> with its major current user:
>
> userspace tree for the dtrace tool itself:
> https://github.com/oracle/dtrace-utils.git, dev branch
> kernel tree comprising this series and a few other patches needed by
> dtrace:
> https://github.com/oracle/dtrace-linux-kernel, v2/5.17-rc2 branch
>
> (See the README.md in the latter for dtrace build instructions. Note the need for a
> reasonably recent binutils, a trunk GCC, and a cross-bpf toolchain.)
>
>
> /proc/kallsyms is very useful for tracers and other tools that need to
> map kernel symbols to addresses.
>
> It would be useful if there were a mapping between kernel symbol and module
> name that only changed when the kernel source code is changed. This mapping
> should not change simply because a module becomes built into the kernel, so
> that it's not broken by changes in user configuration. (DTrace for Linux
> already uses the approach in this patch for this purpose.)
>
> In brief we do this by mapping from address ranges to object files (with
> assistance from the linker map file), then mapping from object files to
> potential kernel modules. Because the number of object files is much smaller
> than the number of symbols, this is a fairly efficient representation, even with
> a bit of extra complexity to allow object files to be in more than one module at
> once.
>
> The size impact of all of this is minimal: in one of my tests, vmlinux grew by
> 0.17% (10824 bytes), and the compressed vmlinux only grew by 0.08% (7552 bytes):
> though this is very configuration-dependent, it seems likely to scale roughly
> with the kernel as a whole.
>
> This is all controlled by a new config parameter CONFIG_KALLMODSYMS, which when
> set results in output in /proc/kallmodsyms that looks like this:
>
> ffffffff8b013d20 409 t pt_buffer_setup_aux
> ffffffff8b014130 11f T intel_pt_interrupt
> ffffffff8b014250 2d T cpu_emergency_stop_pt
> ffffffff8b014280 13a t rapl_pmu_event_init [intel_rapl_perf]
> ffffffff8b0143c0 bb t rapl_event_update [intel_rapl_perf]
> ffffffff8b014480 10 t rapl_pmu_event_read [intel_rapl_perf]
> ffffffff8b014490 a3 t rapl_cpu_offline [intel_rapl_perf]
> ffffffff8b014540 24 t __rapl_event_show [intel_rapl_perf]
> ffffffff8b014570 f2 t rapl_pmu_event_stop [intel_rapl_perf]

hi,
I tried this version and can't see the symbols size

[root@qemu jolsa]# cat /proc/kallmodsyms | grep ksys_ | head -5
ffffffff81094720 T ksys_ioperm
ffffffff81141110 T ksys_unshare
ffffffff81160410 T ksys_setsid
ffffffff811c64b0 T ksys_sync_helper
ffffffff813213c0 T ksys_fadvise64_64

I have CONFIG_KALLMODSYMS=y, but I haven't checked if I need
anything else

jirka