RE: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()

[David Laight]

From: Kalle Valo
> Sent: 10 February 2022 12:16
> 
> Qing Wang <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > From: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
> > When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
> > can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.
> >
> > fix do_div.cocci warning:
> > do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
> > index 4c944e5..2cee9dd
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
> > @@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ __acquires(&p->tid_rx_lock) __releases(&p->tid_rx_lock)
> >  			seq_puts(s, "\n");
> >  			if (!num_packets)
> >  				continue;
> > -			do_div(tx_latency_avg, num_packets);
> > +			div64_u64(tx_latency_avg, num_packets);
> 
> As you have been pointed out in your other patches, do_div() and
> div64_u64() work differently.

And how long does it take for num_packets to exceed 2^32.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)